ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Clinical characteristics, survival and prognostic nomogram for patients with esophageal mucinous adenocarcinoma: a SEER population-based analysis.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma with mucinous carcinoma-predominant lymph node metastases: a case report.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a rare adenocarcinoma (AC) subtype. Limited research exists on its incidence, survival rates, and treatment responses. This study utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to compare the clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with esophageal MAC, AC, and signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRC), and developed nomograms to predict outcomes. Methods: Patient information was retrieved from the SEER database from 2004 to 2015. The baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Prognostic factors for esophageal MAC patients were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Results: A total of 497 esophageal MAC, 21,109 esophageal AC and 1,144 esophageal SRC patients were selected. MAC patients were more likely to have a higher pathological grade (P<0.001), and later T stage (P<0.001) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (P=0.003) than AC patients. The proportion of grade I-II MAC patients was higher than that of SRC patients. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of MAC patients were similar to those of AC patients. However, MAC patients had significantly better OS and CSS than SRC patients. After PSM analysis, the OS and CSS of MAC patients were similar to those of AC and SRC patients (all P>0.05). In MAC patients, N stage, M stage, and surgery were independent predictive factors for both OS and CSS. The area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curves demonstrated high precision and discrimination. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the CSS and OS nomograms have high potential clinical value. Conclusions: Esophageal MAC patients had similar survival compared with esophageal AC and esophageal SRC patients. The nomograms provide OS and CSS predictions for MAC patients, to aid clinicians in predicting patients' prognoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.