ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Real-world experience of lenvatinib-based therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Given the significant advancements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the emergence of novel treatment approaches, establishing reliable predictors has become crucial for optimizing patient selection and therapeutic sequencing in HCC. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and treatment efficacy associated with lenvatinib-based therapy. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 53 patients receiving lenvatinib monotherapy, and 19 patients receiving lenvatinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy as their first-line systemic treatment for unresectable HCC at a single medical center. We employed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to ascertain the factors influencing survival in these cohorts. Results: For lenvatinib monotherapy and the combination therapy, the objective response rates were 30.2% and 63.2%, respectively (P=0.03); the median progression-free survival (PFS) durations were 7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.5-9.5] and 12 months (95% CI: 6.4-17.6), respectively (P=0.74); and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group (P=0.93). Although patients receiving the combination therapy had a greater treatment response, no significant survival differences were observed between the lenvatinib monotherapy and combination therapy subgroups, even after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Patients who received lenvatinib monotherapy could be stratified based on a combination of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade (either grade 1 or 2a) and a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ≤5.8. Compared to the other subgroups combined, those who met both of these criteria exhibited PFS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.382 (95% CI: 0.168-0.871; P=0.02), corresponding to 11 and 5 months, respectively; and an OS (HR: 0.198, 95% CI: 0.043-0.920; P=0.04) of not reached versus 12 months, respectively, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis. Conclusions: In our study cohort, there were no statistically significant differences observed in the survival rates between patients treated with lenvatinib monotherapy and those treated with a combination of lenvatinib and immunotherapy. The incorporation of ALBI grade and NLR facilitates the stratification of survival outcomes in patients with unresectable HCC undergoing lenvatinib monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.