ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Unexpected peritoneal metastases diagnosed at the time of primary colon cancer resection: controversies regarding options for management.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases synchronously occurring in the patient with primary colon cancer causes that patient to be at high risk for subsequent disease progression within the abdomen and pelvis. If peritoneal metastases are preoperatively diagnosed, patients are likely to be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without biological therapy prior to cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, if one only considers patients with peritoneal metastases unexpectedly identified at the time of primary colon cancer resection, the optimal management strategy is neither standardized nor evidence based. These authors present an opinion regarding treatment options in unexpectedly (incidentally) detected peritoneal metastases. The primary colon cancer may be asymptomatic (elective list) or may present as an emergency with obstruction or with perforation. The fitness of the patient, the condition of the colon, availability of a colonic stent, consent of the patient and capabilities of the institution for management of peritoneal metastases by CRS and intraperitoneal chemotherapy cannot be ignored and must all be considered. These patients with known peritoneal metastases should not be allowed to return for further treatment with advanced disease after multiple regimens of systemic chemotherapy. Delay in definitive management will cause peritoneal metastases to be unresectable and not amenable to cure. It is time to debate optimal management strategies for unexpectedly detected peritoneal metastases. The authors find the data compelling that the modifications presented in the management of unexpected peritoneal metastases documented at the time of colon cancer resection changes a palliative approach to treatment to a plan that has curative intent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.