ArticleData in brief2024
Adhesion extent data of repaired rabbit Achilles tendons three weeks post-surgery and characterization data of different implant materials used for these surgeries.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As one major problem after tendon rupture repair, surgeons are confronted with fibrotic adhesion formation of the healing tendon to the surrounding tissue. Although early active motion is recommended during rehabilitation, adhesions may lead to joint stiffness and a restricted range of motion. One viable option to counteract adhesion formation is to add a thin elastic tube that is placed over the conventionally sutured repair site. Such a tube reduces adhesion formation because it acts as a physical barrier. Additionally, such barriers can be optimized by adding a biolubricant. We here present adhesion data of rabbit Achilles tendons that were fully transsected, repaired with a 4-strand suture and received a) no implant; b) an electrospun DegraPol tube and c) a bi-layered tube with one electrospun DegraPol layer and one high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HA)/polyethylene oxide (PEO) electrospun layer. Based on Picrosirius red stained tendon cross-sections three weeks post-operation, the percentage of adhesion data is presented. Moreover, mechanical data of the implant materials are presented as a further dataset, with the following readouts: fracture strain [%], ultimate tensile stress [MPa] and Young's modulus [MPa]. They are presented in axial and transverse stretching directions, respectively. The adhesion data can be reused for comparison to other implant materials, drugs or anti-adhesive strategies that are applied in similar pre-clinical models like the rabbit Achilles tendon model. The mechanical data of the implant materials offer the possibility to compare electrospun meshes based on other polymers to the materials used here or for computational models of such materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.