Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554547›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

A dataset revolutionizing Indian bay leaf analysis.

Priyanka Paygude, Sandip Thite, Ajay Kumar, Amol Bhosle, Rajendra Pawar, Renuka Mane, Rahul Joshi, Manisha Kasar, Prashant Chavan, Milind Gayakwad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Priyanka PaygudeBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Sandip ThiteVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Ajay KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal University, Jaipur, India.
Amol BhosleMIT School of Computing, MIT Art Design and Technology University, Pune, India.
Rajendra PawarMIT School of Computing, MIT Art Design and Technology University, Pune, India.
Renuka ManeSchool of Computer Engineering and Technology, Dr Vishwanath Karad, MIT World Peace University, Pune, India.
Rahul JoshiSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Manisha KasarBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Prashant ChavanBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Milind GayakwadBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indian bay leaf is a crucial spice in Indian cuisine. However, its quality and authenticity are often compromised. To address this, we introduce The Digital Indian Bay leaf dataset, a comprehensive collection of high-resolution 5696 images capturing diverse bay leaf samples under controlled conditions. The dataset encompasses variations in leaf conditions such as fresh leaf, dried leaf and diseased prone leaf. The dataset is meticulously curated to support research in condition analysis and machine learning applications for leaf quality assessment. To ensure data diversity, each category includes a wide range of images captured under controlled conditions with varying lighting, background, and leaf orientation. By providing a standardized and accessible resource, this dataset aims to accelerate research in this domain and contribute to the improvement of the Indian spice industry.

Indexed as

ClassificationIndian bay leaf datasetIndian bay leaf quality assessmentMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39554547
PMCPMC11565027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.