ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Stochastic simulation to optimize rice breeding at IRRI.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficiency under epistasis of haplotype-based genomic selection for pure line breeding.Heredity · 2026Article
- Accelerated breeding modernization: a global blueprint for driving genetic gains, climate resilience, and food security in rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- A unified global costing framework catalyzes strategic investment in rice breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genetic improvement in rice increased yield potential and improved varieties for farmers over the last decades. However, the demand for rice is growing while its cultivation faces challenges posed by climate change. To address these challenges, rice breeding programs need to adopt efficient breeding strategies to provide a steady increase in the rate of genetic gain for major traits. The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) breeding program has evolved over time to implement faster and more efficient breeding techniques such as rapid generation advance (RGA) and genomic selection (GS). Simulation experiments support data-driven optimization of the breeding program toward the desired rate of genetic gain for key traits. Methods: This study used stochastic simulations to compare breeding schemes with different cycle times. The objective was to assess the impact of different genomic selection strategies on medium- and long-term genetic gain. Four genomic selection schemes were simulated, representing the past approaches (5 years recycling), current schemes (3 years recycling), and two options for the future schemes (both with 2 years recycling). Results: The 2-Year within-cohort prediction scheme showed a significant increase in genetic gain in the medium-term horizon. Specifically, it resulted in a 22%, 24%, and 27% increase over the current scheme in the zero, intermediate, and high genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) contexts, respectively. On the other hand, the 2-Year scheme based on between-cohort prediction was more efficient in the long term, but only in the absence of GEI. Consistent with our expectations, the shortest breeding schemes showed an increase in genetic gain and faster depletion of genetic variance compared to the current scheme. Discussion: These results suggest that higher rates of genetic gain are achievable in the breeding program by further reducing the cycle time and adjusting the target population of environments. However, more attention is needed regarding the crossing strategy to use genetic variance optimally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.