ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Comparison of tissue damage and inflammation for robotic laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in early endometrial cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systemic inflammatory response after robotic versus laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with colorectal cancer subgroup analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a propensity-matched comparison of the inflammatory response and MASLD trajectories.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer: effect on inflammatory factors and quality of life.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Among Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgeries in Women with Obesity Diagnosed with Endometrial Cancer: Results from a Quaternary Hospital in Thailand.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Resection of Rectal and Gastric Cancer with the da Vinci Single-Port System: A Case Report.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Article
- Postoperative innate immune function after minimally invasive transcervical esophagectomy (MICE) versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (MIE).Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- An empirical study on the psychological impact of medical AI on patients undergoing dental surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of tissue damage and inflammatory response for transoral laser microsurgery versus open surgery in the management of early-stage laryngeal cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study was to analyze the dynamics of tissue damage and inflammatory response markers perioperatively and whether these differ between robotic laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in early endometrial cancer. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial conducted at SHANGHAI FIRST MATERNITY and INFANT HOSPITAL, eighty women with early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive either robotic or conventional laparoscopy. Blood samples were collected at admission, immediately before surgery, 2 h after surgery, 24 h after surgery, 48 h after surgery, and 1 week after surgery. The samples were analyzed for various biomarkers associated with inflammatory processes and tissue damage. These included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count, interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol, creatine kinase (CK), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF- Results: There was no significant difference in clinical and preoperative data between two groups. The results showed that the patients who underwent robotic laparoscopy had a longer pre-surgical time compared to the conventional laparoscopy group. However, the robotic group had shorter operating times, quicker vaginal cuff closures, and lower estimated blood loss compared to the conventional laparoscopy group. The hospital stays, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and drainage volume on the first day after operation were lower in robotic group compared to conventional laparoscopy group. hs-CRP, WBC, IL-6 and cortisol were significantly lower in the robotic group, though the differences were transient. Discussion: This study demonstrated that robotic laparoscopy, used in early endometrial cancer treatment, leads to a reduced inflammatory response, less tissue damage, and lower stress levels, as evidenced by decreased levels of hs-CRP, IL-6, and cortisol, compared to conventional laparoscopy. These findings suggest that robot- laparoscopy may facilitate a quicker recovery and improve patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.