ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Clinical Pharmacist Involved in the Treatment of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The first-line treatment for severe Methods: The clinical pharmacist monitored the concentration of TMP/SMZ in the serum, urine and sputum of a 6-month-old child with PCP infection. To improve the serum levels of TMP/SMZ, the dose of TMP/SMZ was increased, while infusions of other medications were reduced to decrease the rate of drug excretion. Additionally, the patient received other supportive medications to enhance clinical therapeutic efficacy. Results: Clinical pharmacists observed that, despite administration of a sufficient dose of TMP/SMZ, plasma concentration of TMP/SMZ remained below the therapeutic window, while urine concentrations were extremely high. This phenomenon was attributed to Augmented Renal Clearance (ARC), often seen in critically ill patients and associated with increased renal clearance. Throughout treatment, the concentrations of SMZ remained below the minimum effective concentration, while the concentrations of TMP fell within the effective target range. However, sufficient therapeutic effects were ultimately achieved and observed in the patient, likely due to improved drug distribution in lung tissue (sputum) and the patient's recovering immune functions. Finally, thanks to individualized pharmaceutical care from clinical pharmacists and the combined efforts of clinicians, the patient was discharged after 58 days of hospitalization. Conclusion: Throughout treatment, the clinical pharmacist played a vital role in optimizing the treatment plan based on the serum, urine and sputum concentrations of TMP/SMZ and providing pharmaceutical care to ensure a safe, rational and effective medications in children. Individualized dose adjustments, particularly high-dose TMP/SMZ guided by TDM, can significantly enhance the management of PCP in pediatric patients and support clinical pharmacists in delivering individualized pharmaceutical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.