Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554381›Full record

ReviewBrain communications2024

Glial fibrillary acidic protein in Alzheimer's disease: a narrative review.

Florine Leipp, Jérôme Vialaret, Pablo Mohaupt, Salomé Coppens, Aurore Jaffuel, Ann-Christin Niehoff, Sylvain Lehmann, Christophe Hirtz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Comparative analyses of Alzheimer's disease blood biomarkers and cognitive domains.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Association of plasma biomarkers with amyloid and tau PET in pre-dementia stages.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Florine LeippShimadzu France SAS France, Noisiel, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4105-3434
Jérôme VialaretIRMB-PPC, INM, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, INSERM CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Pablo MohauptIRMB-PPC, INM, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, INSERM CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Salomé CoppensIRMB-PPC, INM, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, INSERM CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Aurore JaffuelShimadzu Europa GmbH, Duisburg, Germany.
Ann-Christin NiehoffShimadzu Europa GmbH, Duisburg, Germany.
Sylvain LehmannIRMB-PPC, INM, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, INSERM CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6117-562X
Christophe HirtzIRMB-PPC, INM, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, INSERM CNRS, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are fundamental in neural functioning and homeostasis in the central nervous system. These cells respond to injuries and pathological conditions through astrogliosis, a reactive process associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. This process is thought to begin in the early stages of these conditions. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a type III intermediate filament protein predominantly expressed in astrocytes, has emerged as a key biomarker for monitoring this response. During astrogliosis, GFAP is released into biofluids, making it a candidate for non-invasive diagnosis and tracking of neurodegenerative diseases. Growing evidence positions GFAP as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease with specificity and disease-correlation characteristics comparable to established clinical markers, such as Aβ peptides and phosphorylated tau protein. To improve diagnostic accuracy, particularly in the presence of confounders and comorbidities, incorporating a panel of biomarkers may be advantageous. This review will explore the potential of GFAP within such a panel, examining its role in early diagnosis, disease progression monitoring and its integration into clinical practice for Alzheimer's disease management.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseastrocytesbiomarkerglial fibrillary acidic proteinreactive astrogliosis

Identifiers

PMID39554381
PMCPMC11568389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.