Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554302›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology open science2024

Genetic Predisposition to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Where Do We Stand?

Martin Hennenberg, Sheng Hu, Alexander Tamalunas, Christian G Stief

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Benzyl Benzoate Isolation fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Risk factors for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comprehensive review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin HennenbergDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sheng HuDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander TamalunasDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian G StiefDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Genetic predisposition is a factor in 40-70% of cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and voiding symptoms. However, informal reviews summarizing genes and variants imparting genetic disposition to BPH are not yet available. Methods: We conducted an informal narrative review of genes and variants associated with BPH or voiding symptoms in candidate gene studies, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and Mendelian randomization studies. A literature search of PubMed was performed using the terms "BPH heritability", "LUTS heritability", "BPH risk variant", "LUTS genetic risk", "GWAS BPH", and "genome-wide BPH". Key findings and limitations: Candidate gene studies focused on variants related to the vitamin D receptor, steroid metabolism, detoxification, inflammation, cytokines, and growth factors, which were previously found to be associated with prostate cancer. Despite overall limited conclusiveness of candidate gene approaches, some recent studies point to population-dependent contributions of single variants to genetic BPH predisposition. Four GWAS and two Mendelian randomization studies for BPH identified correlation of BPH and voiding symptoms with variants related to testosterone, prostate-specific antigen, progesterone, transcription factors, the cell cycle, neuronal organization, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Conclusions and clinical implications: The drug targetability of most of the genes identified in the BPH setting is precluded by predictable unbalanced side effects, low efficacy, unknown organ specificity, and a lack of characterization in the prostate. Meta-analyses of GWAS are not yet available for BPH. Unless calculated using quantitative approaches, specific contributions of the risk variants identified to the overall risk of BPH remain uncertain. Patient summary: While age is a risk factor for benign enlargement of the prostate in all affected patients, genetic factors may be involved in 39-72% of patients. Research has identified a number of possible risk genes, but is still at a very early stage. It is unlikely that drugs could be used to target these genes because of expected side effects that would be tolerated for cancer treatment, but not for benign diseases, or low efficacy in previous clinical trials.

Indexed as

Benign prostatic hyperplasiaCandidate gene studyGenetic predispositionGenome-wide association studyLower urinary tract symptomsVoiding symptoms

Identifiers

PMID39554302
PMCPMC11563937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.