ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2024
Positive association between patient experience of primary care with chronic disease and self-rated health in a Japanese rural area: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey using the Japanese primary care assessment tool short form.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare-Seeking Behaviors in a Depopulated Rural Area of Shiga Prefecture, Japan in 2025: A Descriptive Study Using the Ecology of Medical Care Model.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- Positive association between patient experience of primary care with chronic disease and self-rated health in a Japanese rural area: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey using the Japanese primary care assessment tool short form.Journal of general and family medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low birthrates and an aging society during population decline have brought about labor shortages and increased medical care needs. Medical resources should be distributed appropriately, particularly in rural areas. High-quality primary care can make the medical system more effective and contribute to rural residents' health. However, there are no reports on the impact of primary care on health in the rural areas of Japan. This study examined the effect of primary care quality on self-rated health in a rural Japanese area. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using a questionnaire survey of residents of a rural area in northern Shiga Prefecture in 2021. Self-rated health (SRH) was used as the health outcome (1-5 points), and the Japanese Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form (JPCAT-SF) was used to measure the patients' experience of primary care (0-100 points). We conducted a multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis and examined the association between good SRH (4 points or more) and high JPCAT-SF scores (above average score), adjusted for sociodemographic confounding factors. Results: A total of 1108 men and 1412 women responded to the survey. The mean patient age was 69.8 years. The mean JPCAT-SF score was 51.8 points. Among the 1172 patients with chronic diseases, good SRH was associated with high JPCAT-SF scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.009-1.73). Conclusions: Good SRH among rural residents with chronic disease was associated with high primary care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.