ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024
Efficient protocol for isolating human fibroblast from primary skin cell cultures: application to keloid, hypertrophic scar, and normal skin biopsies.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Cellular and Tissue Response to Herbal Glucose/Cellulose-based Mesoporous Graphene Frameworks in a Rat Diabetic Wounds Model.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- Isolation, validation, and long-term culture of mouse ear fibroblasts.Biology open · 2026Article
- Selective Paracrine Modulation of Stromal Cells: Wharton's Jelly MSC Secretome Enhances Adipose-Derived MSC Functionality While Maintaining Dermal Fibroblast Quiescence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This protocol introduces a streamlined and efficient method for isolating human fibroblast from skin primary cell culture with a specific focus on its application to keloid, hypertrophic scar, and normal skin biopsies. Additionally, the absence of suitable animal models for keloid and hypertrophic scar has led preclinical research to rely on in vitro studies using primary cell cultures. This approach addresses the challenges of existing protocols in terms of time, cost, equipment, and technical expertise required. The method involves derivation, culture, and characterization analysis including cell proliferation, migration, and fibroblastic marker (Vimentin, CD90, CD73, and CD105) expression. Our study yielded high amounts of fibroblast from tested skin explants while maintaining their in vivo-like characteristics and behaviour. Immunostaining assay confirmed that the cultivated fibroblast was positively expressed Vimentin. Flowcytometry results showed high expression of CD90 and CD73 while relatively showing lower expression of CD105. Fibroblast derived from keloid tissue showed the highest rate of proliferation and migration ability compared to the other samples. These findings suggest an efficient and reproducible technique to cultivate high qualified fibroblast from human skin in normal or pathological condition, particularly for keloid and hypertrophic scar. The application of this protocol provides a foundation for further studies to investigate the progression and potential intervention of aberrant fibrotic dermatological disorder, in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.