Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554213›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2024

Developing a Threshold Concept Assessment Rubric: Using the Johnstone's Triangle Framework for Understanding Intermolecular Forces.

Simbarashe Nkomo, Alia Bly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simbarashe NkomoDivision of Natural Science and Mathematics, Oxford College of Emory University, Oxford, Georgia 30054, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6802-6253
Alia BlyDivision of Natural Science and Mathematics, Oxford College of Emory University, Oxford, Georgia 30054, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In undergraduate science education, laboratory courses stand as essential cornerstones of experiential learning. Chemistry laboratory courses offer students unique hands-on experiences that bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. The journey through the undergraduate chemistry curriculum is paved with a series of conceptual gateways known as threshold concepts that can dramatically shape a student's understanding and success. We identified the idea of intermolecular forces (IMFs) as a threshold concept to students' ability to link molecular structures, properties, and applications to real-world problems such as extraction and separation of compounds. The development of course-specific pedagogical tools can provide students with the scaffolding necessary for the transition from novice to expert-level disciplinary comprehension. This work presents the development process of a Threshold Concept Assessment Rubric (TCAR) based on Johnstone's triangle framework and discusses its application for evaluating students' progress in overcoming a threshold concept. The rubric is used in a 200-level multilayer laboratory course that is intentionally designed with intermolecular forces as the central theme. We analyze the role and structure of different questions to provide a holistic assessment of students' learning processes using sample assignments. Furthermore, we demonstrate how insights from statistical analyses can highlight areas in which students struggle to gain expert or exemplary-level understanding of IMFs. This rubric development approach can be applied to other threshold concepts.

Identifiers

PMID39554213
PMCPMC11562578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.