ArticleJournal of chemical education2024
Structuring Materials to Support Student Learning: Analysis of Instructional Materials from a Professional Development Workshop.
Article in Journal of chemical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faculty development programs play a crucial role in enhancing learning by equipping educators with the necessary skills, knowledge, and pedagogical strategies to teach more effectively. One such program is the Promoting Active Learning in Analytical Chemistry (PALAC) workshop, which aimed to educate faculty on methods to create and use active learning course materials to support students during the process of learning. This research aimed to assess the design of classroom instructional materials generated by faculty that attended the PALAC workshops. The theories of Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and scaffolding were used as lenses to characterize the materials because they describe the benefits of providing support through the process of developing knowledge. The active learning materials were analyzed by assigning the cognitive levels of processing, as described by Marzano's taxonomy, to all questions asked across 134 in-class activities. The use of the cognitive levels of processing allowed the researchers to gauge the presence of scaffolding by tracking how the cognitive levels of processing changed from question to question across each in-class activity. The results from this study indicate that the majority of materials provide opportunities for students to engage with higher-order questions, but there is less evidence for the effective and consistent structuring of the materials. These results have implications for future faculty development programs, suggesting the need to allot more time for faculty to practice developing effective classroom materials. In conjunction, this work demonstrates the effective use of Marzano's taxonomy in assessing the cognitive structure of in-class activities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.