ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Counterfactual Diffusion Models for Interpretable Morphology-based Explanations of Artificial Intelligence Models in Pathology.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Deep learning (DL) can extract predictive and prognostic biomarkers from histopathology whole slide images, but its interpretability remains elusive. Methods: We introduce MoPaDi (Morphing histoPathology Diffusion), a framework for generating counterfactual explanations for histopathology that reveal which morphological features drive deep learning classifier predictions. MoPaDi combines self-supervised diffusion autoencoders with task-specific classifiers to manipulate images and flip predictions by altering visual features. To address weakly supervised scenarios common in pathology, it integrates multiple instance learning. We validate MoPaDi across four tasks: tissue type, cancer subtypes, slide origin, and a biomarker (microsatellite instability) classification. Counterfactuals are evaluated through pathologist studies and quantitative analysis. Results: MoPaDi achieves high image reconstruction quality (MS-SSIM 0.966-0.992) and good classification performance (AUCs 0.76-0.98). In a blinded observer study, two pathologists misclassified between 26.7% and 63.3% of synthetic images as real across all tasks, indicating that MoPaDi-generated images often exhibit high perceptual realism. Furthermore, counterfactual images revealed interpretable, pathology-consistent morphological changes recognizable by experts. Conclusion: MoPaDi is a practical and extensible framework for counterfactual explanations generation in computational pathology. It enables interpretable, model-specific insight into what morphological changes drive classification outcomes, improving interpretability in clinical deep learning models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.