ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Quantifying the Impact of Hair and Skin Characteristics on Signal Quality with Practical Recommendations for Improvement.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fostering inclusive participation in non-invasive neurotechnology research: a community-based study with an underrepresented population.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) holds transformative potential for research and clinical applications in neuroscience due to its non-invasive nature and adaptability to real-world settings. However, despite its promise, fNIRS signal quality is sensitive to individual differences in biophysical factors such as hair and skin characteristics, which can significantly impact the absorption and scattering of near-infrared light. If not properly addressed, these factors risk biasing fNIRS research by disproportionately affecting signal quality across diverse populations. Our results quantify the impact of various hair properties, skin pigmentation as well as head size, sex and age on signal quality, providing quantitative guidance for future hardware advances and methodological standards to help overcome these critical barriers to inclusivity in fNIRS studies. We provide actionable guidelines for fNIRS researchers, including a suggested metadata table and recommendations for cap and optode configurations, hair management techniques, and strategies to optimize data collection across varied participants. This research paves the way for the development of more inclusive fNIRS technologies, fostering broader applicability and improved interpretability of neuroimaging data in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.