ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
An Open Competition for Biomarkers of Aging.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embracing non-linearity in human ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Epigenetic ageing clocks: statistical methods and emerging computational challenges.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Open scientific competitions have successfully driven biomedical advances but remain underutilized in aging research, where biological complexity and heterogeneity require methodological innovations. Here, we present the results from Phase I of the Biomarkers of Aging Challenge, an open competition designed to drive innovation in aging biomarker development and validation. The challenge leverages a unique DNA methylation dataset and aging outcomes from 500 individuals, aged 18 to 99. Participants are asked to develop novel models to predict chronological age, mortality, and multi-morbidity. Results from the chronological age prediction phase show important advances in biomarker accuracy and innovation compared to existing models. The winning models feature improved predictive power and employ advanced machine learning techniques, innovative data preprocessing, and the integration of biological knowledge. These approaches have led to the identification of novel age-associated methylation sites and patterns. This challenge establishes a paradigm for collaborative aging biomarker development, potentially accelerating the discovery of clinically relevant predictors of aging-related outcomes. This supports personalized medicine, clinical trial design, and the broader field of geroscience, paving the way for more targeted and effective longevity interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.