ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Altricial brains and the evolution of infant vocal learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human infant vocal development is strongly influenced by interactions with caregivers who reinforce more speech-like sounds. This trajectory of vocal development in humans is radically different from those of our close phylogenetic relatives, Old World monkeys and apes. In these primates most closely related to humans on the evolutionary tree, social feedback plays no significant role in their vocal development. Oddly, infant marmoset monkeys, a more distantly related New World primate, do exhibit socially guided vocal learning. To explore what developmental mechanism could have evolved to account for these behavioral differences, we hypothesized that the evolution of human and marmoset vocal learning in early infancy in both species is because they are born neurally altricial relative to other primate and in a cooperative breeding social environment. Our analysis found that, indeed, human and marmoset brain are growing faster at birth when compared with chimpanzees and rhesus macaques, making them altricial relative to these primates. We formalized our hypothesis using a logistic growth model showing that the maturation of a system dependent on the rate of brain growth and the amount of social stimuli benefits from an altricial brain and a cooperative breeding environment. Our data suggest that in primates, the evolution of socially guided vocal learning during early infancy in humans and marmosets was afforded by infants with a relatively altricial brain and behavior, sustained and stimulated by cooperative breeding environments. Significance statement: Humans rely on social feedback from caregivers to learn how to produce species-typical sounds, whereas other primates like macaque monkeys or chimpanzees do not. What accounts for this difference in developmental strategies? We tested the hypothesis that being born with a more immature (thus more plastic) brain may be the reason by using marmoset monkeys. This species is more distantly related to humans but exhibit the same type of vocal learning and who have a similar socially rich infant care environment. We found that, indeed, human and marmoset brain are growing faster at birth when compared with chimpanzees and rhesus macaques, making them altricial relative to these primates and this explains their similar vocal developmental strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.