ArticleEye and brain2024
Correlations Between Disability Score, Optical Coherence Tomography and Microperimetry in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Eye and brain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking prognosis in multiple sclerosis: a multiaxial perspective.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize ocular motility disturbances through Microperimetry (MP) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) trying to detect those capable of influencing the disability to improve the accuracy of assessing visual impact in EDSS scale. MP results were compare with some structural parameters obtained by OCT. Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional analytical and correlational case-control study approved by Ethical Committee. A total of 82 eyes (41 patients) and 30 healthy eyes (15 subjects) were enrolled after informed consent. All participants underwent ophthalmological evaluation with MP and OCT. Variables included MS disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score; in OCT: central macular thickness (CMT), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIPL), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFL); and in MP: test duration, reaction time, average macular threshold (AT), and 4 fixation stability indexes (P1, P2, BCEA63, BCEA95). Results: MS group showed a significant decrease in GCIPL (p < 0.001) and pRNFL thickness (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Furthermore, patients demonstrated a longer examination (p < 0.001) and reaction (p < 0.001) times, reduced AT (p < 0.001), more unstable fixation indexes (P1 p <0.004, P2 p = 0.018, BCEA63 p = 0.005 and BCEA95 p = 0.007), measured by MP. In addition, patients with a history of ON (n=16) demonstrated longer examination times in MP (p = 0.049) compared to MS patients without ON, but they were not correlations with OCT measurements, EDSS score correlated with the CMT (p = 0.023, r = -0.25), MP duration (p = 0.043, r = 0.22), and fixation indexes (P1 p = 0.049, r = -0.22, BCEA63 p = 0.041, r = 0.23, BCEA95 p = 0.049, r = 0.22). Conclusion: Our study emphasizes the complementary utility of MP and OCT in assessing MS patients. Additionally, it highlights that using MP for objective measurements of oculomotor dysfunction could improves accuracy in disability assessment on the EDSS scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.