Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39553725›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Calibrations without raw data-A response to "Seasonal calibration of the end-cretaceous Chicxulub impact event".

Melanie A D During, Dennis F A E Voeten, Jeroen H J L Van der Lubbe, Per E Ahlberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melanie A D DuringDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dennis F A E VoetenDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-2824
Jeroen H J L Van der LubbeGeochemistry & Geology Cluster, Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7545-6502
Per E AhlbergDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9054-2900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent article by DePalma et al. reported that the season of the End-Cretaceous mass extinction was confined to spring/summer on the basis of stable isotope analyses and supplementary observations. An independent study that was concurrently under review reached a similar conclusion using osteohistology and stable isotope analyses. We identified anomalies surrounding the stable isotope analyses reported by DePalma et al. Primary data are not provided, the laboratory where the analyses were performed is not identified, and the methods are insufficiently specified to enable accurate replication. Furthermore, isotopic graphs for carbon and oxygen contain irregularities such as missing data points, duplicate data points, and identical-length error bars for both elements despite different scales, that appear inconsistent with laboratory instrument outputs. A close examination of such methodological omissions and data irregularities can help to raise the standards for future studies of seasonality and prevent inaccurate claims or confirmation bias.

Indexed as

SeasonsCalibrationCarbon IsotopesOxygen IsotopesCarbon IsotopesOxygen IsotopesDataEnd-CretaceousMass spectrometryOsteohistologySeasonality

Identifiers

PMID39553725
PMCPMC11568822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.