ArticleHeliyon2024
MobVGG: Ensemble technique for birds and drones prediction.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Coagulansin-A's therapeutic potential and safety in an ovalbumin (OVA) induced airway inflammation model.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Pretreatment with probiotics (Bacillus safensis NMCC-189 and Bacillus clausii) prevents epileptogenesis in mice via modulation of BBB integrity, oxidative stress, and neurotransmitter balance.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Article
- Facial emotion based smartphone addiction detection and prevention using deep learning and video based learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An intelligent optimized object detection system for disabled people using advanced deep learning models with optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-11-12Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection of aerial activities, including drones and birds, has practical implications for automating bird surveys and developing radar systems for aerial object collision detection. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been extensively utilized for image recognition and classification tasks, albeit prior research predominantly focuses on single-class 'drone' classification. However, a gap persists in achieving high accuracy for multi-class classification. To address the limitations of traditional CNNs, such as vanishing gradients and the necessity for numerous layers, this study introduces a novel model termed "MobVGG." This model combines the architectures of MobileNetV2 and VGG16 to accurately classify images as either 'bird' or 'drone'. The dataset comprises 4212 images for each category of 'bird' and 'drone'. The stringent methodology was applied for dataset preparation and model training to ensure the reliability of the findings. Comparative analysis with previous research demonstrates that the proposed MobVGG model, trained on both 'bird' and 'drone' images, achieves superior accuracy (96 %) compared to benchmark studies. Our paper targets researchers and graduate students as its primary audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.