ArticleHeliyon2024
A benchmark for Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test automatic scoring.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer Vision Scoring of Figure Copy and Recall.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automated versus human scoring of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test: a rapid review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Rey-Osterrieth complex figure (ROCF) test is a neuropsychological task that can be useful for early detection of cognitive decline in the elderly population. Several computer vision systems have been proposed to automate this complex analysis task, but the lack of public benchmarks does not allow a fair comparison of these systems. To advance in that direction, we present a benchmarking framework for the automatic scoring of the ROCF test that provides: the ROCFD528 dataset, which is the first open dataset of ROCF line drawings; and experimental results obtained by several modern deep learning models, which can be used as a baseline for comparing new proposals. We evaluate different state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) under traditional and transfer learning paradigms. Experimental quantitative results (MAE = 3.448) indicate that a CNN specifically designed for sketches outperforms other state of the art CNN architectures when the number of examples available is limited. This benchmark can also be a paradigmatic example within the broad field of machine learning for the development of efficient and robust models for analyzing line drawings and sketches not only in classification but also in regression tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.