ArticleHeliyon2024
Utilizing machine learning algorithms for task allocation in distributed agile software development.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distributed agile software development (DASD) has become a prominent software development approach. Proper task allocation is crucial in DASD to avoid undesirable outcomes including project rejection by clients, unfavorable team attitudes, and project failure. Coordination and communication issues occur as businesses embrace the DASD environment more frequently to tap into global talent and knowledge while cutting development expenses. To overcome these challenges, efficient task allocation planning becomes a crucial success component in software project management. The purpose of this study is to utilize machine learning (ML) predictive algorithms to determine the most appropriate role for a given task, with the aim of assisting software managers in making task assignments more efficiently and effectively in DASD environment. Preprocessing steps applied to the dataset include data cleaning, normalization, and partitioning into training, validation, and test sets. Four model classifiers were used in the experiment: Random Forest, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), and AdaBoost. The results showed that Random Forest outperformed the other classifiers in task allocation prediction, achieving an accuracy of 96.7 %, followed by K-NN (94.2 %), Decision Tree (93.5 %), and AdaBoost (93 %). The study demonstrates that ML models are effective in tackling task allocation issues in DASD settings, and the outcomes are promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.