ArticleHeliyon2024
SPICT tool among intubated elderly patients at emergency department.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Psychometric Validation of the Palliative Care Experience Scale (PCES): An Experience-Oriented Assessment Instrument.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global rise in the aging population necessitates a proactive approach to palliative care, with a substantial gap between the demand for and access to such care. The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) has emerged as a valuable instrument for identifying patients at risk of deterioration and death, enhancing the timely initiation of palliative care. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients aged 60 and above who got intubated in the emergency department (ED), with and without fulfilling SPICT criteria. Methods: This retrospective single-center study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Thailand. The research involved 408 adults aged 60 and older who underwent ED intubation and subsequent admission. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data were collected, encompassing vital signs, comorbidities, and SPICT criteria. Mortality rates between SPICT criteria-fulfilled and non-fulfilled groups were compared. Results: Out of 408 analyzed patients, SPICT criteria were met by 39.7 % of patients, exhibiting distinctive features such as a higher respiratory rate and lower diastolic blood pressure. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were most prevalent comorbidities. Respiratory and neurological disorders were the leading final diagnoses. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 28 %, significantly higher in the SPICT criteria-fulfilled group compared to the non-fulfilled group (34.0 % vs 23.6 %, P = 0.022). SPICT criteria demonstrated moderate sensitivity (48.7 %) and specificity (63.7 %) for predicting mortality. Conclusion: SPICT criteria identified elderly patients at an elevated mortality risk following intubation in the emergency setting. The early implementation of SPICT as a screening tool for identifying palliative care candidates is advocated for more effective advance care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.