ArticleHeliyon2024
Intractable late onset pacemaker endocarditis and complications case report.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers, have undeniably revolutionized the treatment of cardiac conditions. However, just like any other treatment or intervention some significant challenges can be encountered in CIEDs, mainly, CIED infections. With reported incidence rates ranging from 1 % to 15 % these infections can pose lead to dangerous complications. Our case report presents an occurrence of late-onset pacemaker endocarditis, which despite proper antibiotic therapy required an open-heart surgery as the only curative option. Case presentation: Our patient is a 50-year-old female known to have a pacemaker implanted twenty years ago, she presented with fever and purulent discharge from her pacemaker site. After thorough investigations, diagnostic tests confirmed a Serratia marcescens infection and despite antibiotic treatment, the patient's symptoms persisted, an echocardiography revealed tricuspid valve involvement with vegetations. Surgical intervention, by complete removal of the old and new pacemaker leads, tricuspid valvuloplasty, and installation of an epicardial pacemaker, was performed. Conclusion: Our case highlights the rarity and complexity of Serratia marcescens-related pacemaker endocarditis and all CIEDs in general, while emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary management to optimize patient outcomes. Early diagnosis, prompt treatment, and comprehensive surgical approaches are essential in managing CIED infections and achieving successful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.