Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39553598›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

A comprehensive analysis of the machine learning pose estimation models used in human movement and posture analyses: A narrative review.

Federico Roggio, Bruno Trovato, Martina Sortino, Giuseppe Musumeci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Federico RoggioDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Anatomy, Histology and Movement Science, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Bruno TrovatoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Anatomy, Histology and Movement Science, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Martina SortinoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Anatomy, Histology and Movement Science, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe MusumeciDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Anatomy, Histology and Movement Science, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate measurement and analysis of human movement are essential in fields ranging from rehabilitation and neuroscience to sports science and ergonomics. Traditional methods, though precise, are often constrained by cost, accessibility, and controlled environments. The advent of machine learning (ML) pose estimation models (PEMs) offers an alternative solution, enabling detailed motion analysis using low-cost imaging systems in various settings. The aim of this review is to evaluate ML PEMs and their impact on human movement sciences, focusing on recent advancements in machine learning and computer vision for accurate, non-invasive motion analysis using low-cost imaging systems. A narrative review was conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed and Google Scholar, using key terms such as "machine learning," "pose estimation models," and "human movement sciences." Thematic analysis identified key advancements, applications, and challenges in ML PEMs across clinical, sports, and ergonomic contexts. The review highlights the development, capabilities, and applications of models such as OpenPose, PoseNet, AlphaPose, DeepLabCut, HRNet, MediaPipe Pose, BlazePose, EfficientPose, and MoveNet, emphasizing their potential for non-invasive, cost-effective assessments. In clinical settings, these models enable objective gait and posture analysis, aiding in diagnosing musculoskeletal disorders and tracking rehabilitation progress. In sports, ML PEMs enhance performance analysis and injury prevention by providing real-time feedback and detailed biomechanical data. In ergonomics, they offer proactive solutions for workplace injury prevention through real-time posture and movement analysis. While promising, the implementation of ML PEMs faces challenges in accuracy, data quality, and integration into existing practices. Establishing standardized protocols and frameworks is crucial for ensuring reliable, interdisciplinary applications. This review can be useful for coaches, healthcare professionals, and researchers in evaluating and implementing ML PEMs, ultimately advancing the field of human movement sciences.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceErgonomicsInjury preventionKinematicsMovementPhysiotherapyPostureSports

Identifiers

PMID39553598
PMCPMC11566680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.