ArticleHeliyon2024
Driver fatigue detection using PPG signal, facial features, head postures with an LSTM model.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Steering Wheel Prototype for In-Vehicle Vital Sign Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Driver Drowsiness Detection using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Remote photoplethysmography for health assessment: a review informed by IntelliProve technology.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Background and objective: Human fatigue is a major cause of road traffic accidents. Currently widely used fatigue driving detection methods are based on eyelid closure, vehicle information or physiological parameter detection. However, the detection of each single feature has certain limitations. Which in turn affects the accuracy of detection and the possibility and efficiency of prediction. Methods: This paper introduces a novel driver fatigue detection framework that leverages facial features, head pose, and PPG signals to establish a fatigue detection model. To validate this approach, a real-road driving experiment was conducted, resulting in the acquisition of multi-source feature signal data from 30 drivers. Utilizing a method for locating 68 facial landmarks, we extracted 2D facial and 3D head feature parameters. Additionally, five-dimensional heart rate variability (HRV) features were extracted from PPG signals. These ten-dimensional features were fused to construct a fatigue driving dataset. Subsequently, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network model for fatigue detection was established and optimized using four optimization algorithms: Momentum, Rmsprop, Adam, and SGD. For comparison, Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) models were also evaluated. Within the dataset, 2880 samples were designated as the training set, while 720 samples served as the test set. Results: Adam's optimized LSTM fatigue detection model is the most effective, with a model accuracy of 97.36 %, precision of 97.4 %, recall of 97.4 %, and F1 of 0.97. It shows that the model can provide a more timely and accurate prediction and warning for drivers who are already fatigued.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.