ArticleHeliyon2024
Patient-centered endometriosis care implementation at tertiary and secondary care hospitals in Indonesia.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometriosis has a high recurrence rate within five years (40-50 %). High recurrence remarkably reduces Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). Patient-centered endometriosis care (PCEC) is a range of care that respects the patient's preferences and needs while being guided by the patient's values and may provide better treatment for patients. Our study is the first to evaluate the implementation of PCEC in Indonesia. Materials and methods: We evaluated PCEC at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in Jakarta (Center-1), Raden Mattaher Hospital in Jambi, and dr. Zainoel Abidin Hospital in Aceh (Center-2) from October 2021 to May 2022. Center-1 represented tertiary care, and center-2 represented secondary care. This study used the ENDOCARE Questionnaire (ECQ) instrument, which produced mean important score (MIS), percentage of negative performance (PNP), and patient-centeredness score (PCS) as outcomes. Higher PCS reflects greater patient-centered care of the center. Results: A total of 73 patients were recruited and divided into two groups of centers. Patients from Center-1 had significantly higher patient-centeredness scores vs. patients in centers without the training and guideline: dimension "Respect for patients' values, preferences, and needs" (Center-1 7.33, 6-10, Center-2 6, 6-6; p < 0.001), dimension "Coordination and integration of care" (Center-1 6, 4.44-8.67, Center-2 5.5, 4-6; p = 0.006), dimension "Information, communication, and education" (Center-1 7.14, 6-8.29, Center-2 5.14, 5.14-6; p < 0.001), dimension "Physical comfort" (Center-1 6, 6-8, Center-2 6, 6-6; p = 0.033), dimension "Endometriosis clinical staff" (Center-1 6, 6-9, Center-2 6, 6-6, p = 0.049). Subjects with higher education and experienced endometriosis recurrences statistically had higher patient-centeredness scores. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that endometriosis training and having endometriosis clinical guidelines could improve patients' experience in receiving PCEC. Information for patients should be made simple so they can understand the purpose of the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.