ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2024
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (PF-SES) possess multiple properties improving targeted drug elution and in-stent reendothelialization without the presence of polymers. The long-term clinical performance comparison between PF-SES and the latest generation polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), particularly regarding intravascular imaging assessment and in the type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) population, remains unexplored. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 2646 diabetes patients meeting coronary artery disease (CAD) criteria underwent coronary stents in the real-world. All patients were divided into the PF-SES group and the SES group. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate the imaging characteristics of in-stent reendothelialization. Patient information between the two groups was systematically compared in hospital and at 5-year follow-up. Results: In terms of basic characteristics, the proportion of current smoker and stable angina patients in the PF-SES group was significantly higher than that in the SES group. The PF-SES group exhibited significantly higher rate of left anterior descending (LAD) lesion and more stents per patients compared to the SES group. The value of minimum lumen area (MLA), neointimal area (NA) and neointimal thickness (NT) were higher in the PF-SES group. Additionally, the occurrence rates of heterogeneous, lipid layer, intimal tears, thrombi, and micro-vessels were notably lower in the PF-SES group compared to the SES group. A higher all-cause mortality was observed in the SES cohort. Discussion: PF-SES could effectively improve in-stent reendothelialization in patients with type 2 DM, with positive effects on survival rate and may, therefore, be considered as an alternative treatment option for improving clinical long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.