Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39553388›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025

Systematic comparison of fluorescence imaging in the near-infrared and shortwave-infrared spectral range using clinical tumor samples containing cetuximab-IRDye800CW.

Bas Keizers, Thomas S Nijboer, Christa A M van der Fels, Marius C van den Heuvel, Gooitzen M van Dam, Schelto Kruijff, Igle Jan de Jong, Max J H Witjes, Floris J Voskuil, Dimitris Gorpas and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bas KeizersUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3798-7702
Thomas S NijboerUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Optical Molecular Imaging Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0642-451X
Christa A M van der FelsUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Urology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marius C van den HeuvelUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gooitzen M van DamAxelaRx/TRACER B.V., Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-8696
Schelto KruijffUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Igle Jan de JongUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Urology, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-5548
Max J H WitjesUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Optical Molecular Imaging Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4135-3246
Floris J VoskuilUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Optical Molecular Imaging Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3740-4554
Dimitris GorpasHelmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9576-8087
Wesley R BrowneUniversity of Groningen, Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5063-6961
Pieter J van der ZaagUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9080-4907

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Shortwave-infrared (SWIR) imaging is reported to yield better contrast in fluorescence-guided surgery than near-infrared (NIR) imaging, due to a reduction in scattering. This benefit of SWIR was shown in animal studies, however not yet in clinical studies with patient samples. Aim: We investigate the potential benefit of SWIR to NIR imaging in clinical samples containing cetuximab-IRDye800CW in fluorescence-guided surgery. Approach: The potential of the epidermal growth factor-targeted NIR dye cetuximab-IRDye800CW in the shortwave range was examined by recording the absorption and emission spectrum. An Results: Based on the emission spectrum, cetuximab-IRDye800CW can be detected in the SWIR range. In clinical PSCC samples, overall SWIR imaging was found to perform similarly to NIR imaging (NIR imaging is better than SWIR in the 2/7 criteria examined, and SWIR is better than NIR in the 3/7 criteria). However, when inspecting HNSCC data, NIR is better than SWIR in nearly all (5/7) examined criteria. This difference seems to originate from background autofluorescence overwhelming the off-peak SWIR fluorescence signal in HNSCC tissue. Conclusion: SWIR imaging using the targeted tracer cetuximab-IRDye800CW currently does not provide additional benefit over NIR imaging in

Indexed as

CetuximabHead and Neck NeoplasmsIndolesOptical ImagingSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredBenzenesulfonatesCarcinoma, Squamous CellFluorescent DyesHumansMalePenile NeoplasmsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurgery, Computer-AssistedBenzenesulfonatesCetuximabFluorescent DyesIndolesIRDye 800CWcontrast-to-noise ratiofluorescence-guided surgeryfluorescence molecular imagingnear-infrared imagingoptical imagingshortwave-infrared imaging

Identifiers

PMID39553388
PMCPMC11566260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.