ArticleMaedica2024
The Incidence of Myocardial Infarction after Vaccination against COVID-19: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship between acute coronary syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019 infection and vaccination type: a retrospective observational study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVaccines were developed to stop the pandemic stage of COVID-19. A wide range of adverse effects, including vascular complications, has been reported after vaccination. Up to now, various studies have reported different rates of myocardial infarction (MI) after COVID-19 vaccination. So, this meta-analysis and systematic review study was designed to estimate the pooled incidence of MI after COVID-19.
methodsTwo experienced researchers conducted searches in various databases and sources such as EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed and gray literature, including references from studies published before March 2023. They collected information on participant count, the number of individuals who experienced MI after vaccination, average age, vaccine type, primary author, publication year and country of origin.
resultsA total of 385 articles were revealed by a literature search, and for further evaluation, 248 studies remained after removing duplicates. Seven articles remained for meta-analysis. Three studies provided the number of controls and the incidence of MI in both vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups. The incidence of MI after COVID-19 vaccines was ignorable (0%, I
conclusionAs shown by the results of the present meta-analysis and systematic review, the incidence of MI after COVID-19 vaccination can be ignorable and the risk was not increased by vaccination.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.