Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39553353›Full record

ArticleMaedica2024

Long Term Outcomes after Surgery for Inguinal Hernia: a Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Outcomes of Desarda and Lichtenstein Repairs with Three Years of Follow-Up.

Akshant Anil Pathak, Aakash Fouzdar, Karan Kumar, Vivek Agrawal, Naveen Sharma, Vaibhav Aggarwal

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akshant Anil PathakResident, Department of General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Aakash FouzdarResident, Department of General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Karan KumarResident, Department of General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Vivek AgrawalProfessor, Department of General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Naveen SharmaProfessor, Department of General Surgery, AIIMS, Jodhpur, India.
Vaibhav AggarwalResident, Department of General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compares the outcomes of Desarda and Lichtenstein repairs over a period of three years after surgery.

methodsIn the present study we included a total number of 624 patients over 18 years of age, out of whom 240 underwent Desarda repair and 384 Lichtenstein repair. Patient data was collected from patient records to compare the two repair groups. Primary outcome measures were the presence of recurrence and chronic inguinal pain after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included operating times, return to activity, short term (<28 days after surgery) complications, long term complications such as infections, abdominal wall stiffness and groin numbness, and patient satisfaction after surgery.

resultsThere was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two repairs. Chronic inguinal pain after Desarda repair showed greater and more significant decrease with time.

conclusionIt appears that Desarda repair is as efficacious as Lichtenstein repair for hernia surgery, with a better long term pain profile. The short term complication rate is similar for both surgical procedures.

Identifiers

PMID39553353
PMCPMC11565157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.