ArticleCancer informatics2024
Detecting the Tumor Prognostic Factors From the YTH Domain Family Through Integrative Pan-Cancer Analysis.
Article in Cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Emerging evidence suggests that N6-methyladenosine (m Methods: Herein, we focused on one special protein family of the "readers" of m Results: YTH family genes were significantly differentially expressed in most of the cancers, particularly increased in Gastrointestinal cancers, and decreased in Endocrine and Urologic cancers. In addition, they were observed to be associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) with various extent, especially in lower grade glioma (LGG), thyroid cancer (THCA), liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and kidney clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), so were some "writers" (METLL3, METLL14, WTAP) and "erasers" (FTO, ALKBH5). Further survival analysis illustrated that YTH family genes specifically YTHScore constructed by combining 5 YTH family genes, as well as RWEScore calculated by combining genes from "readers"-"writers"-"erasers" could dramatically distinguish tumor prognosis in 4 representative cancers. As expected, YTHScore presented an equally comparable prognostic classification with RWEScore. Finally, analysis of immune signatures and clinical characteristics implied that, the activity of the innate immune, diagnostic age, clinical stage, Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage and immune types, might play specific roles in modulating tumor prognosis. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that YTH family genes had the potential to predict tumor prognosis, in which the YTHScore illustrated equal ability to predict tumor prognosis compared to RWEScore, thus providing insights into prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets at the pan-cancer level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.