Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39553332›Full record

ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology

Deep Learning Algorithm for Keratoconus Detection from Tomographic Maps and Corneal Biomechanics: A Diagnostic Study.

Wiyada Quanchareonsap, Ngamjit Kasetsuwan, Usanee Reinprayoon, Yonrawee Piyacomn, Thitima Wungcharoen, Monthira Jermjutitham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wiyada QuanchareonsapDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ngamjit KasetsuwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Usanee ReinprayoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yonrawee PiyacomnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thitima WungcharoenDepartment of Ophthalmology, MedPark Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Monthira JermjutithamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rayong Hospital, Rayong, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) approach for differentiating between normal cornea, subclinical, and keratoconus (KC) using tomographic maps from Pentacam (Oculus) and corneal biomechanics from Corvis ST (Oculus). Methods: A total of 1,668 tomographic (769 patients) and 611 biomechanical (307 patients) images from the Chula Refractive Surgery Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were included. The sample size was divided into the Pentacam and combined Pentacam-Corvis groups. Different convolutional neural network approaches were used to enhance the KC and subclinical KC detection performance. Results: AI model 1, which obtained refractive maps from Pentacam, achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.938 and accuracy of 0.947 (sensitivity, 90.8% and specificity, 96.9%). AI model 2, which added dynamic corneal response and the Vinciguerra screening report from Corvis ST to AI Model 1, achieved an AUC of 0.985 and accuracy of 0.956 (sensitivity, 93.0% and specificity, 94.3%). AI model 3, which added the corneal biomechanical index to AI Model 2, reached an AUC of 0.991 and accuracy of 0.956 (sensitivity, 93.0% and specificity, 94.3%). Conclusions: Our study showed that AI models using either anterior corneal curvature alone or combined with corneal biomechanics could help classify normal and keratoconic corneas, which would make diagnosis more accurate and would be helpful in decision-making for the treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceForme fruste keratoconusKeratoconusKeratoconus suspectMachine learningSubclinical keratoconus

Identifiers

PMID39553332
PMCPMC11567606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.