ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Myopia Controlling using Low Dose Atropine Eye Drop.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design-Dependent Myopia Control in Orthokeratology: Spherical Versus Aspherical Back Optic Zone Profiles.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Atropine Eye Drops in Childhood Myopia Control: A Review.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine myopic progression, axial length elongation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), pupil dilation, and accommodation amplitude following 24 months of Atropine 0.01% usage among progressive myopic patients. Methods: Fifty-one progressive myopic patients (age range, 3.5-17 years) were included in the present study. Fifteen patients were excluded due to loss to follow-up (eight patients) and Atropine complications (seven patients) and 36 patients continued therapy. Myopic progression, axial length, far and near BCVA, pupil diameter, and accommodation amplitude were measured at baseline examination and repeated every 6 months up to 2 years. All patients were recommended to instill one drop of Atropine 0.01% in each eye every night. Absolute success of therapy was defined as myopic progression ≤0.50 diopter (D) and axial length growth ≤0.2 mm per year. Results: Mean myopic progression was 0.16 and 1.28 D and mean axial length change was 0.05 and 0.69 mm at months 12 and 24, respectively. Pupil dilation was 1.26 and 1.84 mm and accommodation reduction was 3.38 and 3.37 D at the same follow-ups, while BCVA was not changed. Absolute success rate for myopic progression control was 56.8% at 12 months and 70.8% at 24 months follow-up. In addition, the success rate in respect to axial length changes was 44.4% and 58.3% at the same time points. Conclusions: Atropine 0.01% can slow myopic progression and axial length elongation at least in 50% of myopic cases at 12- and 24-month follow-up with no significant complications. Therefore, Atropine therapy is recommended in cases of progressive myopia in children and teenagers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.