ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Serum p-Glycoprotein and Monomeric C-Reactive Protein are Elevated in Takayasu Arteritis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CRP Is a Key Indicator of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Vascular Injury and Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Existing biomarkers including C-reactive protein (CRP) do not adequately distinguish active and inactive TAK. We compared serum p-glycoprotein (p-gp)/Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MDR1), monomeric CRP (mCRP), CRP, and mCRP:CRP ratio in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and healthy controls and their relationship with disease activity. Patients and Methods: Serum p-gp mCRP (ELISA) and CRP (nephelometry) were compared between consecutive adults with TAK (>18 years) enrolled from a prospective cohort (n = 92) and healthy controls (n = 29), and between active vs inactive TAK (n = 46 each). In a subset of active immunosuppressive-naïve TAK (n = 29), correlation was assessed between serum p-gp and p-gp expression on circulating T helper lymphocyte populations: overall (CD4+), Th17 (CD4+IL-17+), Th17.1 (CD4+IL-17+IFN-γ+) lymphocytes [normalized to Tregs (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+)]. Changes in serum p-gp, mCRP, CRP, and mCRP:CRP were compared before and after immunosuppression (n = 29). Data was represented using median (Q1-Q3). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated for TAK vs controls, and active vs inactive TAK with serum p-gp, mCRP, CRP, and mCRP:CRP. Multivariable-adjusted linear regression was used to predict active disease with serum p-gp, mCRP, CRP, or mCRP:CRP. Results: Serum p-gp (11.19 vs 8.05 ng/mL), mCRP (1.61 vs 1.25 µg/L), and CRP (5.40 vs 2.1 mg/L) were elevated in TAK vs controls (p <0.05 for all). CRP was higher and mCRP:CRP ratio was lower in active vs inactive TAK (p < 0.001). ROC curves identified moderate prediction for active disease with CRP and inactive disease with serum p-gp (area under ROC curve 0.705 and 0.392, respectively). Multivariable-adjusted linear regression confirmed association of CRP with active disease (p = 0.009) and serum p-gp with inactive disease (p = 0.041). In treatment-naïve TAK, serum p-gp negatively correlated with p-gp+Th17.1 lymphocytes (Spearman's rho=-0.39, p = 0.046). CRP and serum p-gp were significantly lowered following immunosuppressive therapy in treatment-naïve TAK (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Serum p-gp and mCRP are elevated in TAK. Serum p-gp is associated with inactive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.