ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2024
Risk of bacterial colonization by torniquet during arthroscopy of the knee joint.
Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The following study investigated the risk of transmission or spread of potentially pathogenic bacteria via surgical gloves and/or with an elastic bandage to achieve a bloodless surgical site during arthroscopy. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective study performed at a level-1 trauma center. The included patients were between 18 and 65 years of age and underwent arthroscopy of the knee joint. Before arthroscopy, two skin swabs (one before and one after wrapping the leg with an elastic bandage) were taken for further microbiological analysis. In addition, the thumb and index finger of the right glove of the surgeon's gloves and the part of the bandage covering the knee joint was kept for microbiological examination. Results: 208 samples from 52 patients were included. No patient had a surgical site infection (SSI) during the follow-up period of at least 12 months. The evaluation of the microbiological findings detected contamination of the elastic wrapping material in 83% (43/52) of the cases, primarily with Conclusion: Preoperative skin antisepsis is mandatory due to the risk of SSI caused by skin flora. However, in a population without a history of joint infection, the current preoperative standards for skin antisepsis seem to be sufficient to minimize SSIs during knee arthroscopy. A glove change after elastic wrapping is not necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.