ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024
Opportunities for tuberculosis elimination in the Canadian Arctic: cost-effectiveness of community-wide screening in a remote Arctic community.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Planning and implementation of a community-wide tuberculosis screening intervention: a case study from Naujaat, Nunavut, Canada.International journal of circumpolar health · 2026Article
- The health impact of identifying a person with tuberculosis through systematic screening.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Health Service Contracting in the Prevention and Treatment of Tuberculosis: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In response to a tuberculosis (TB) outbreak in the remote community of Qikiqtarjuaq Nunavut, Canada, community leaders and the territorial government initiated community-wide screening (CWS) for tuberculosis, an expensive undertaking given the high cost of providing medical services in the Canadian arctic. Our study aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Qikiqtarjuaq CWS. Methods: We developed a hybrid decision analysis and Markov model to replicate the experience and extrapolate CWS outcomes over a 20-year time horizon. Following a hypothetical cohort with patient characteristics reflecting the demographic and testing data available from the CWS, the model compared a one-time CWS intervention with the reference case of 'no community-wide screening'. Findings: CWS resulted in improved health gains through prevention of active tuberculosis cases compared with no CWS. It also resulted in increased costs (measured in Canadian dollars), with a very low estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $25.10 (95% URs: cost savings-$15,874) per additional quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with current standard of care approach (no CWS). Community-wide screening in this context would be considered highly cost-effective in this setting. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, we found >99% of iterations were cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained. Interpretation: While costly, coordinated and intensive community-wide tuberculosis screening activities are highly cost-effective in remote arctic communities when utilized in an outbreak context. Funding: Government of Nunavut.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.