Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39553291›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024

Opportunities for tuberculosis elimination in the Canadian Arctic: cost-effectiveness of community-wide screening in a remote Arctic community.

Alice Zwerling, Edwina Veerasingam, Ellen Snyder, Andrea Schertzer, Keith Travers, Carolyn Pim, Chris Pease, Sandy Finn, Linette McElroy, Jean Allen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alice ZwerlingSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Edwina VeerasingamSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Ellen SnyderSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Andrea SchertzerCanadian Public Health Service, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Keith TraversDepartment of Health, Government of Nunavut, Iqaluit, Canada.
Carolyn PimSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Chris PeaseDepartment of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Sandy FinnDepartment of Health, Government of Nunavut, Iqaluit, Canada.
Linette McElroyNunavut Tunngavik Inc., Iqaluit, Canada.
Jean AllenNunavut Tunngavik Inc., Iqaluit, Canada.
Mike PattersonDepartment of Health, Government of Nunavut, Iqaluit, Canada.
Gonzalo G AlvarezDepartment of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In response to a tuberculosis (TB) outbreak in the remote community of Qikiqtarjuaq Nunavut, Canada, community leaders and the territorial government initiated community-wide screening (CWS) for tuberculosis, an expensive undertaking given the high cost of providing medical services in the Canadian arctic. Our study aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Qikiqtarjuaq CWS. Methods: We developed a hybrid decision analysis and Markov model to replicate the experience and extrapolate CWS outcomes over a 20-year time horizon. Following a hypothetical cohort with patient characteristics reflecting the demographic and testing data available from the CWS, the model compared a one-time CWS intervention with the reference case of 'no community-wide screening'. Findings: CWS resulted in improved health gains through prevention of active tuberculosis cases compared with no CWS. It also resulted in increased costs (measured in Canadian dollars), with a very low estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $25.10 (95% URs: cost savings-$15,874) per additional quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with current standard of care approach (no CWS). Community-wide screening in this context would be considered highly cost-effective in this setting. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, we found >99% of iterations were cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained. Interpretation: While costly, coordinated and intensive community-wide tuberculosis screening activities are highly cost-effective in remote arctic communities when utilized in an outbreak context. Funding: Government of Nunavut.

Indexed as

Active case findingCommunity wide screeningEconomic evaluationIndigenous communitiesInfectious disease modellingTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39553291
PMCPMC11564039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.