ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience
Efficacy of Percutaneous vs Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tibial Nerve Stimulation: Recent Progress and Challenges.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Biomaterials and Nanomedicine for Mucosal Repair and Inflammation Control in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: An Extensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a symptom syndrome consisting of urgency, frequency, and nocturia. It is a common urologic disorder. Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a minimally invasive, well-tolerated, and effective treatment of OAB. Recently, transcutaneous PTN stimulation (TTNS) with surface electrodes has been used, which is non-invasive. This study examines and compares the efficacy of these two therapy methods. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 44 patients with OAB were randomly assigned to PTNS and TTNS groups. In both groups, the therapeutic interventions were performed thrice a week for four weeks, 12 sessions. Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) and OAB symptom score (OABSS) were evaluated before the intervention, then one week and four weeks after completing the sessions. Results: Of 44 patients (41 females and 3 males), the mean age of the subjects was 51.95 years in the PTNS group and 56.86 years in the TTNS group (P=0.9). In our study, the patients' urinary symptoms and QOL improved in both groups over time. Both interventions had no significant difference (P=0.796, P=0.372, respectively). Conclusion: PTNS and TTNS effectively improved patients' symptoms of OAB and their QOL. TTNS can be considered as effective as conventional PTNS and a less invasive alternative for PTNS in OAB treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.