ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Survival benefit of surgery in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the Evidence Gap: A Retrospective Lens on Survival and Treatment Patterns in Older Patients With Colorectal Cancer.Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Surgery Reduces Cancer-specific Death in Elderly Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A SEER-Based Competing-Risk Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, compared to younger patients, elderly patients often had multiple commodities and may refuse surgery due to being medically unfit or the high risk of operative mortality. This study aims to explore the effects of surgery on short- and long-term mortality in elderly LARC patients using a nationwide cancer registry. The cohort included 6211 patients aged over 65, with 2556 matched through propensity scoring for comparison between surgery (N = 1704) and non-surgery (N = 852) groups. The Cox proportional hazard model compared mortality between these groups. Our results showed that the elderly LARC patients who underwent surgery were more likely to be younger (65-75 years), have clinically-positive lymph nodes, and no comorbidities. Surgery was associated with significantly lower 3-month, 6-month, and 5-year mortality rates, with a greater absolute survival benefit (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.78; 95% CI, 2.71-8.43; aHR, 4.50; 95% CI, 3.07-6.58 and aHR, 3.81; 95% CI, 3.21-4.51). In stratified analysis, surgery remains provide significantly survival benefit according different age, gender and clinical classification. Furthermore, among non-surgical patients, those receiving chemoradiation had better survival outcomes compared to those receiving radiation, chemotherapy, or no treatment (all P < 0.001). This study highlights the survival advantage of surgery in elderly LARC patients and offers valuable guidance for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.