Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39553120›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Pseudotumor in Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

Danielle Piper, Juliette A Saloway, Lee Jeys, Shakir Hussain

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle PiperTrauma and Orthopedics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, GBR.
Juliette A SalowayTrauma and Orthopedics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Lee JeysOrthopedic Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, GBR.
Shakir HussainTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudotumors are a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA), arising from local soft tissue reactions. These reactions can lead to painful joint effusions and prosthetic loosening, often necessitating revision surgery. Metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene prostheses are particularly prone to this complication due to the accumulation of metal debris from prosthetic wear, which represents a significant drawback. In contrast, ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) prostheses are considered a superior alternative, offering lower wear rates and avoiding complications related to metal debris. This case report presents a rare instance of pseudotumor formation in a CoC THA. A 57-year-old patient underwent a cementless CoC THA in 2010. Despite developing a pulmonary embolism, the patient experienced no prosthetic-related complications until 2021, when they presented to the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital with concerns about a deep vein thrombosis. MRI and ultrasound scans of the hip revealed a complex collection involving the iliopsoas bursa and a small joint effusion, prompting a biopsy. Histopathology confirmed a pseudotumor with tissue necrosis, macrophages, neutrophils, and ceramic debris. In 2024, the patient underwent revision arthroplasty with excision of the pseudotumor. The original prosthesis was well-fixed, with minimal damage to the ceramic head and acetabular liner, and there were no signs of infection or metallosis. Following the revision, the patient's pain resolved, and they were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery.

Indexed as

adverse local tissue reaction (altr)aseptic lymphocytic vasculitic associated lesions (alval)ceramic arthroplastymetallosispseudotumour

Identifiers

PMID39553120
PMCPMC11563772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.