ArticleCureus2024
Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Arrhythmia in Acute Myocardial Infarction Presentation: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive utility of the baseline Tp-e interval for early arrhythmic events in acute myocardial infarction: A cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Studies of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Factors Associated with Arrhythmia in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Prediction of Non-Cardiac Organ Failure in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with Arrhythmia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Arrhythmias are well-recognized complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and are an important risk factor for mortality in both men and women across a wide age range. Aim This study aims to analyze the incidence of arrhythmia in patients with AMI with respect to age, gender distribution, and location of AMI and also to evaluate the prognostic factors of mortality in patients with AMI. Methods This prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study included 300 patients admitted within an hour of the presentation of AMI at a Super Speciality Hospital, MGMMC (Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College), Indore, after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Clinical features, elevated cardiac biomarkers, and an electrocardiogram guided the diagnosis of AMI and arrhythmia. Results Of the total of 300 patients, the majority were male, 280 (93.4%), with a mean age of 57.48 ± 13.48 years. Prevalent risk factors included obesity, 195 (65%); diabetes mellitus, 185 (61.66%); hypertension, 181 (60.33%); smoking, 114 (38%); alcohol consumption, 123 (41%); and hypercholesterolemia, 207 (69%). Among 152 patients with arrhythmia, obesity, ischemic heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and alcohol were more prevalent compared to those without arrhythmia. The arrhythmia incidence was higher in 143 (51.07%) male patients. Out of 37 mortality cases, 29 were associated with arrhythmia. Mortality was highest in extensive anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (EAWMI), 14 (37.24%), and inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI), 13 (35.14%). Conclusion In conclusion, arrhythmia was prevalent in the age group of 45-54 years and among patients with EAWMI. Mortality was significantly associated with arrhythmia and was highest in elderly patients with EAWMI and IWMI. These findings underscore the importance of risk stratification and targeted management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.