ArticleCureus2024
Spontaneous Isolated Celiac Artery Dissection in a Young Woman.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is a rare phenomenon with an unclear pathogenesis. It is more common in men, with a predilection for those in their 50s. A 39-year-old woman with epigastric and back pain visited our emergency department (ED). She had no cardiovascular risk factors. On her first visit to the ED, no signs of peritonitis were noted, and her vital signs were normal. Although a non-contrast abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan was performed, the cause of her abdominal pain remained unidentified. Due to persistent mild-to-severe pain, the patient visited our ED again the following day. Despite repeated blood tests showing no abnormalities, we considered that her abdominal pain was of vascular origin. We performed a contrast-enhanced CT scan, which revealed poor contrast enhancement in the celiac artery without intestinal ischemia. Based on the medical history and CT findings, the patient was diagnosed with SICAD. We consulted a cardiovascular surgeon who advised conservative management. The patient was discharged on the 10th day after admission, and no recurrence of abdominal pain was reported. SICAD is a rare but potentially serious condition that can also occur in younger women. While certain risk factors for SICAD have been identified, some young patients may not have traditional risk factors. Physicians should consider SICAD as a differential diagnosis even in young women when their abdominal pain is persistent without other organ-specific signs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.