ArticleCureus2024
An Analysis of the Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Fragment-Specific Fixation of Intra-articular Distal End Radius Fractures.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of AO/OTA Type C Distal Radius Fractures Treated With Volar Locking Plate Versus Fragment-Specific Plating.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Distal radius fractures (DRFs) present unique challenges for fixation, as they often involve small, periarticular fragments that require advanced techniques to achieve proper anatomical alignment and functional recovery. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fragment-specific fixation in managing these fractures. Methods We conducted a longitudinal study involving 57 patients with fresh intra-articular DRFs. The participants, aged 18-80 years, were evaluated through comprehensive radiological assessments, including X-rays and CT scans, alongside clinical examinations. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained for all procedures. Results The sample included 57 patients; 57.89% were male and 42.11% were female. The most common occupations were housewives (33.33%) and business professionals (19.30%). Injuries were nearly equally distributed between the left (47.37%) and right (52.63%) sides, with road traffic accidents accounting for 52.63% of cases. Radiological evaluations indicated significant improvements in volar tilt, from 10.38 ± 1.46 degrees postoperatively to 9.57 ± 1.67 degrees after three months, and in radial inclination, from 21.09 ± 1.72 degrees to 20.28 ± 2.04 degrees. Clinical outcomes, as measured by Green and O'Brien and Gartland and Werley scores, showed a substantial recovery, with 75.44% of patients achieving an excellent rating with no poor outcomes. Conclusions Based on our findings, fragment-specific fixation for DRFs is highly effective, leading to significant improvements in both radiological and functional outcomes. The technique helped maintain anatomical alignment and facilitated bone healing and we recommend its adoption as a standard treatment for complex DRFs. We also recommend future studies investigating its long-term outcomes and comparing this approach with other fixation methods to optimize patient care further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.