ReviewCureus2024
Impact of Beta-Blocker Therapy on Pregnant Women With Long QT Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) presents significant challenges for pregnant women due to the elevated risk of arrhythmic events. Beta-blocker therapy is a cornerstone of treatment in managing LQTS, but its use during pregnancy introduces potential fetal risks. This systematic review synthesizes the evidence on the efficacy and safety of beta-blocker therapy in pregnant women with LQTS. A systematic review was conducted to assess studies on beta-blocker use in pregnant women diagnosed with LQTS. We reviewed observational studies and case reports to evaluate maternal cardiac outcomes, fetal safety, and the need for postpartum management. Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria focused on LQTS, beta-blocker therapy during pregnancy, and associated maternal and fetal outcomes. Our review showed that beta-blocker therapy significantly reduced arrhythmic events in pregnant women with LQTS, particularly in symptomatic carriers. Multiple studies demonstrated that the continuation of beta-blocker therapy throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period minimized maternal cardiac risks. However, beta-blocker use was associated with fetal risks such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), lower birth weight, and, in some cases, bradycardia. Atenolol, in particular, was linked to significant fetal growth restrictions, while other beta-blockers, such as propranolol and metoprolol, showed more variable effects on fetal outcomes. Despite these concerns, some studies reported favorable postnatal growth recovery in infants exposed to beta-blockers in utero. Beta-blocker use must be carefully managed due to potential fetal risks. Regular monitoring, individualized treatment plans, and appropriate selection of beta-blocker type are essential to optimizing both maternal and fetal outcomes. Further research is necessary to refine treatment protocols and reduce fetal risks associated with beta-blocker therapy during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.