ArticleCureus2024
Effects of Air Pressure and Holding Time on Muscle Blood Flow Promotion in Pneumatic Squeeze Hold.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to investigate the effects of air pressure and holding time on the promotion of muscle blood flow using a squeeze-hold technique with a pneumatic cuff in healthy college students. Methods Subjects (n = 12) were placed in the prone position, and a pneumatic cuff was secured around the left lower leg. The cuff was inflated to predetermined pressures (50, 100, and 200 mmHg) to squeeze the lower leg muscles. After the pressure was held for predetermined time periods (20 seconds, one minute, three minutes, five minutes, and seven minutes), the cuff was deflated to release the associated compression in the lower leg muscles. During the intervention and after release, the hemodynamics of the left gastrocnemius muscle were measured using a muscle infrared spectrometer. Results At 50 mmHg, the promotion of muscle blood flow was absent at all holding times. At 100 mmHg, the effect of enhanced muscle blood flow was observed as follows: for up to one minute after release with holding times of 10 seconds and 1 minute, up to two minutes after release with a holding time of three minutes, and up to eight minutes after holding times of five and seven minutes. At 200 mmHg, a muscle blood flow-promoting effect was observed for up to one minute after release with a holding time of 10 seconds, up to two minutes after release with a holding time of one minute, and up to 10 minutes after release with holding times of three, five, and seven minutes. Conclusion The analysis indicated that a cuff pressure of at least 100 mmHg was necessary to achieve a significant blood flow-promoting effect. Furthermore, longer holding times at higher pressures produced more sustained increases in blood flow. These findings suggest that the squeeze-hold technique, with appropriate pressure and duration, can effectively increase muscle blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.