ArticleCureus2024
Utility of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography in the Age of Expanded Magnetic Resonance Imaging Capabilities: A Global Survey Perspective.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clock-Face Sonography of the Glenoid Labrum: A Pictorial Technical Protocol for Patients Ineligible for MRI/MR Arthrography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) arthrography has been a mainstay in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal (MSK) joint-related pathology for decades. With the advent of MRI and further advancements incorporating powerful magnetic fields, the radiological landscape is undergoing a shift. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relevance and preference for MRI arthrography versus MRI among MSK radiologists in our current clinical practice across a range of geographic locations. Methods A global survey of 52 MSK radiologists was conducted to understand current practices, preferences, and recommendations related to the adoption of MRI arthrography and advanced MRI technologies. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and significant trends were compiled to present the overall preferences of the participants from their clinical experience. Results The majority of the respondents were from the UK (65%), followed by India (13%), the United States (11.5%), and the United Arab Emirates (8%). Of the radiologists surveyed, 98% currently perform MRI arthrogram procedures within their practice, with 27% of clinicians conducting more than 100 MRI arthrogram procedures annually. Regarding the adoption of 3T MRI scanners, 79% of respondents affirmed they have access to the technology within their respective institutions. Concerning the choice of contrast agents used, 84% preferred dilute gadolinium, 8% used saline, 4% used both gadolinium and saline, and another 4% opted for alternative agents. Despite the growing accessibility and utility of 3T MRI, MRI arthrograms remain a favored procedure, especially for shoulder pathology and postoperative cases. For the hip and wrist, the preference leans toward 3T MRI, except for more complex diagnostic purposes or postoperative cases. Conclusions The study's findings suggest that while the advent of the 3T MRI has impacted the frequency with which MRI arthrograms are conducted, it cannot entirely replace the precision and specificity MRI arthrography offers for particular joint pathologies. As institutions expand upon their MRI and imaging infrastructure, further research in this area may help guide MSK radiologists in selecting the most appropriate imaging modality for patients on a case-by-case basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.