ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
A propensity score-matched analysis to evaluate the benefit of adjuvant therapy on disease recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is common in China and has a poor prognosis despite radical surgery. Guidelines around the use of adjuvant therapy (AT) in ESCC are indecisive. We assessed the benefit of AT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in Chinese patients with ESCC using propensity score (PS) matching. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used hospital electronic medical records (EMRs) of 523 adults diagnosed between 2013 to 2019 with pathologically confirmed ESCC after R0 esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. PSs were calculated using a generalized linear regression model based on demographic, clinical, and pathologic features. Patients with and without AT were matched using nearest neighbor method and caliper value 0.05. Subgroup analyses were stratified by PS. Results: Younger patients with more advanced/poorly differentiated disease were more likely to receive AT (P<0.05). There were 137 matched pairs in the AT/No AT groups. After matching, the AT group tended to have longer median RFS [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.21 years (1.54-3.20)] than the No AT group [1.75 years (1.37-2.21)] (P=0.18). The benefit was significant in patients with PS ≥0.40 [hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.87, median RFS (95% CI): 2.22 years (1.30-3.52) versus 1.23 years (0.90-1.64), P=0.03]. In other PS subgroups, median RFS was similar in AT and No AT groups. Conclusions: After adjusting for baseline characteristics, AT tended to improve RFS after R0 esophagectomy in Chinese patients, with significant benefit associated with a higher PS score. The utility of PS to guide patient selection for AT in clinical practice needs further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.