ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Narrow true lumen favors future complication even in small diameter of type B aortic dissection.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes of aortic arch preemptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Impact of Zone 2 preemptive TEVAR on treatment strategy in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a 10-year outcome, study of 29 cases with Zone 2 placement.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- CTA-based morphological parameters predict adverse prognosis in stanford type B aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Validity of current surgical strategies for aneurysmal progression in post-subacute Stanford type B aortic dissection: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with aortic complications in the subacute or chronic phase, but it is still unclear in which patients these complications occur. The objective of this study was to identify the ideal imaging parameter predictive of the risk of aorta-related complications in patients with uncomplicated TBAD. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using prospectively collected data from patients with uncomplicated TBAD at two local hospitals in Japan. Computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed serially, and their association with "aorta-related complication" during follow-up was assessed. Results: During a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, 53 out of 213 patients with uncomplicated TBAD experienced the aorta-related complications, among which 50 (23.5%) were aortic enlargement. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a low true lumen area ratio (TLAR) (<2.9%) at initial subacute phase was a significant prognostic factor for late aorta-related complications (P<0.001). The Cox regression analysis indicated that low TLAR [hazard ratio (HR), 6.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.72-14.69] and an enlargement of the false lumen area (HR, 6.09: 95% CI: 2.22-16.7) were independent predictors of aorta-related complications. Subanalysis revealed a TLAR of 52.9% or less increased the risk of future aorta-related complications, even when the aortic diameter was smaller than 40 mm (P<0.001). Conclusions: A narrow true lumen area at early subacute phase and an enlargement of the false lumen area are potentially good predictors to help us to identify a high-risk subgroup of patients who may benefit from earlier and more aggressive therapy. In particular, a narrow true lumen area is an independent risk factor for the future aorta-related complications, even when the aortic diameter is small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.