ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Evaluation of the safety of drainless uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a two-institution retrospective study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Postoperative pain management after VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax - a systematic review.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Progressive Versus Conservative Chest Tube Management Following Surgery for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical strategies for spontaneous pneumothorax: a narrative review.Journal of visualized surgery · 2026Review
- New Trends in Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) offers good cosmetic outcomes with minimal pain for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Moreover, the early removal of postoperative chest drains reduces postoperative pain and hospitalization duration for patients with PSP. We aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of drainless U-VATS in patients with PSP and compare postoperative outcomes between specialists and residents. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data obtained from the medical records of consecutive patients diagnosed with PSP who underwent surgery at Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital and Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital between April 2023 and March 2024. Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital and Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital initiated the drainless protocol in April and July 2023, respectively. All surgeries were performed using the U-VATS approach with a 1.8-2.0-cm incision. Results: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 54 patients who underwent U-VATS according to the protocol. Postoperative repeated drainage was not required for any patient. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 1 day. No multiport conversions were required. The specialists performed significantly better than the residents based on operative time; however, the other perioperative outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusions: Protocol-compliant drainless surgery for PSP is safe and feasible. The results from the two institutions suggest that residents can adequately perform U-VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax with perioperative outcomes comparable to those of specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.